Safety & pharmacovigilance intelligence

Preserve the chain from evidence to safety action.

StromaOS connects case evidence, literature, trial data, real-world evidence, class effects, signal detection, aggregate analysis, medical assessment, regulatory obligations, and lifecycle follow-up in one governed execution environment.

Connected safety evidence Governed signal execution Preserved medical judgment Traceable regulatory action
The safety operating problem

Signals are not decisions. Decisions are not actions. Actions are not closure.

Pharmacovigilance depends on a chain of evidence, medical judgment, regulatory obligation, operational execution, and lifecycle follow-up. That chain is frequently split across case systems, signal tools, literature workflows, aggregate reports, spreadsheets, committees, documents, and local processes.

01 · Fragmentation

The safety picture is distributed across evidence types.

Individual cases, literature, clinical trial findings, real-world evidence, class effects, toxicology, complaints, and external intelligence are reviewed in separate operating systems.

02 · Weak continuity

Assessment context is lost between reviews.

Signal history, prior rationale, dissent, threshold changes, dismissed hypotheses, outstanding evidence, and follow-up actions are difficult to carry across committees and reporting cycles.

03 · Action disconnect

Recommendations and downstream execution separate.

Monitoring, mitigation, label, communication, study, submission, training, or market actions may be managed outside the signal record that triggered them.

04 · Automation risk

AI can accelerate review without carrying medical authority.

Models can classify, summarize, extract, trend, and draft, but they cannot be allowed to collapse evidence assembly, medical evaluation, regulatory judgment, and release into one uncontrolled action.

How the solution works

Safety becomes one governed signal-to-action lifecycle.

StromaOS coordinates incoming evidence, detection methods, medical assessment, quality gates, regulatory obligations, accountable review, action management, and closure in one execution chain.

STEP 01

Ingest and classify evidence

Cases, literature, trial findings, RWE, complaints, class effects, and external safety intelligence.

STEP 02

Detect and prioritize

Trends, disproportionality, clusters, severity, expectedness, exposure, novelty, and rule-based triggers.

STEP 03

Assemble the assessment

Case series, mechanism, class context, trial evidence, RWE, alternative explanations, uncertainty, and gaps.

STEP 04

Apply medical authority

Signal validation, benefit-risk interpretation, escalation, committee review, decision, and rationale.

STEP 05

Execute safety action

Investigate, monitor, communicate, mitigate, amend, report, update label, or close with evidence.

STEP 06

Preserve and learn

Methods, versions, evidence, rationale, approvals, obligations, follow-up, effectiveness, and lifecycle memory.

Signal control

Every signal remains connected to its evidence, decision, action, and follow-up.

A signal management process should show more than status. StromaOS preserves why a signal was opened, which evidence changed the assessment, which uncertainties remain, who had authority, what action was approved, and what evidence is required for closure.

Exposure and comparator populations for safety studies come from approved cohort packages, so the people behind an assessment are defined once and traceable to the individual.

The result is a continuous safety record rather than a sequence of disconnected committee artifacts.

Model a signal workflow
Safety work routed from case intake through signal detection and clinical assessment to a benefit-risk action authorized by the QPPV or safety lead.

Six stages, each producing a named artifact the next stage can use. A refused action is recorded with the same standing as a completed one.

Governance throughout safety

AI can accelerate evidence work without inheriting medical judgment.

StromaOS separates classification, extraction, detection, synthesis, recommendation, evaluation, approval, reporting, release, and closure. Named medical, safety, regulatory, quality, and governance authorities retain accountable decisions.

Explore the Governance Spine
01

Evidence governance

Every signal assertion remains linked to the cases, analyses, literature, trial findings, real-world evidence, class context, extraction, interpretation, date, and confidence that support it.

02

Detection and threshold control

Disproportionality, trend, seriousness, expectedness, exposure, novelty, frequency, mechanism, and escalation criteria are explicit and versioned.

03

Human medical authority

AI may assemble and analyze evidence. Accountable medical and safety authorities retain signal validation, causality, benefit-risk, action, and closure decisions.

04

Regulatory and release authority

Drafting, medical review, regulatory review, approval, submission, communication, and label release remain separate governed permissions.

05

Evidence Data Trace

Inputs, methods, models, prompts, versions, thresholds, dissent, decisions, approvals, obligations, actions, effectiveness, and closure remain reconstructable.

Start with one signal workflow, aggregate process, or safety evidence bottleneck.

Connect the safety sources and specialist systems already in use. Define the evidence standard, thresholds, medical authority, quality gates, regulatory obligations, and closure criteria. Then run the work as one governed safety operation.